Skip to content
Pick TwoActivity

C2 Proficiency essay from two texts: practice

C2Writing40 questionsUpdated

The compulsory C2 Proficiency essay gives you two short texts and asks you to summarise and evaluate the key points of both in a single essay. It is not a discursive essay with your own opinions bolted on: the content marks come from covering the arguments in the texts, and the evaluation must be argued rather than asserted.

What this task tests

  • Identifying the key point of each text rather than every point it makes.
  • Paraphrasing at C2: restating an argument in different wording and different structure.
  • Evaluating an argument by testing its evidence, its assumptions and its scope.
  • Integrating two sources into one line of argument rather than two separate summaries.
  • Formal register held consistently, including in the conclusion.
  • Attribution language that keeps your voice distinct from the writers’ voices.
  • Hedging: matching the strength of your claim to the strength of the evidence.
  • Organisation: a plan that will still work when you are running out of time.
  • Writing to a word count without padding or truncating.
  • Accuracy in complex sentences written quickly, especially relative clauses and articles.

How to do it

  1. Step 1:

    Find the one key point per text first

    Read each text and write a single sentence saying what it argues, not what it is about. If your sentence has an and in it, you have not found the key point yet.

  2. Step 2:

    Plan the essay around the relationship, not the texts

    The strongest structure is not text one then text two. It is a plan built on where the writers agree, where they diverge, and which position survives scrutiny. That structure alone lifts an answer out of the middle band.

  3. Step 3:

    Paraphrase structurally, not lexically

    Swapping synonyms is still copying. Change the grammar: turn a clause into a noun phrase, an active into a passive, a list into a generalisation. That is what the examiners mean by using your own words.

  4. Step 4:

    Attribute every summarised claim

    The first writer contends, the second text maintains, both authors assume. Without attribution the reader cannot tell your evaluation from your summary, and the content mark suffers even though the content is there.

  5. Step 5:

    Evaluate with a reason attached

    Never write that an argument is convincing and stop. Say what makes it convincing: the evidence is drawn from a longer period, the assumption is one most readers would share, the counter-example is not addressed.

  6. Step 6:

    Write the conclusion as a judgement

    A conclusion that repeats the two summaries wastes the strongest position in the essay. Use it to say which case is stronger and under what conditions that would change.

  7. Step 7:

    Protect fifteen minutes for the second task

    The essay is compulsory and comes first, so it is the one that swallows the clock. Set a hard stop, and if you are behind, cut a supporting example rather than the evaluation.

  8. Step 8:

    Proofread for three things only

    With the minutes you have left, check subject-verb agreement, articles, and the tense of your reporting verbs. Those three account for most of the language errors C2 candidates leave behind.

Mistakes that cost marks

  • Not thisCopying a striking phrase from one of the input texts into your essay.

    ThisRestating the idea with different grammar as well as different words.

    Lifted language is discounted, so a sentence built around it earns nothing and the content point may be lost with it.

  • Not thisWriting two paragraphs that summarise text one and text two in turn, then a paragraph of opinion.

    ThisOrganising by issue, with both texts brought in wherever they bear on it.

    The separate-summaries structure makes integration impossible and caps the organisation mark however good the language is.

  • Not thisI think the second writer is right because I agree with him.

    ThisThe second writer’s case is the stronger because it accounts for the exceptions the first ignores.

    Evaluation must be argued from the text. An unsupported preference is not evaluation, and the first-person assertion also drags the register down.

  • Not thisIn conclusion, both texts have made very interesting points about this important topic.

    ThisIn conclusion, the case for regulation is the more robust, though it depends on funding that neither writer discusses.

    An empty conclusion throws away the last and most visible paragraph. Examiners read it as a sign that the candidate ran out of argument.

  • Not thisThe writer says that it is a big problem and he doesn’t like it.

    ThisThe writer contends that the problem is substantial and is openly critical of the current response.

    Says, big and doesn’t like are all B1 choices. Register slips like this cost the language mark even when the content is correct.

  • Not thisThis proves that all such schemes fail.

    ThisThis suggests that schemes of this kind may struggle where funding is short.

    One example cannot prove a universal claim. Overclaiming is the commonest evaluation error and hedging is the fix.

  • Not thisWriting 400 words because you had more to say.

    ThisWriting within the stated range and cutting the weakest support.

    Overlong answers lose marks for organisation and relevance, and the extra material is rarely the strongest material.

Language this task keeps reusing

take issue with
disagree with a specific claim
place emphasis on
treat something as the most important factor
carry weight
be persuasive or influential
on balance
after weighing both sides
make a case for
argue in favour of
part company
begin to disagree, after agreeing so far
rest on an assumption
depend on something taken for granted
be open to question
be doubtful, arguable
at best
even on the most generous reading
in essence
reduced to its central point
contend
argue, assert in the face of disagreement
concede
admit a point that weakens your own case
overstate
express something as stronger or larger than it is
be difficult to reconcile
be hard to fit together without contradiction
bear in mind
take into account
a line of argument
a connected sequence of reasoning

Practice: essay from two texts

40 original questions. The first 10 are open to everyone. Answers are checked in your browser and never sent to us, so you can share this page with a class as it is.

1Complete the sentence.

The first writer takeswith the claim that the scheme is affordable.
Which sentence best paraphrases 'Rural bus services have been cut to the point where car ownership is no longer optional'?

3Complete the sentence.

It is worth bearing inthat the two writers address very different readerships.
Which opening sentence best suits the compulsory essay?

5Complete the sentence.

The second text places greateron the social costs than on the financial ones.
Decide whether each statement about the compulsory essay is true.
  • You must cover the key points of both input texts.
  • Copying a memorable phrase from an input text is acceptable if you put it in quotation marks.
  • Evaluation means saying which argument is stronger and giving a reason.
3 to go

7Complete the sentence.

This argument carriesonly if the underlying figures are reliable.
Which is the best evaluative sentence?

9Complete the sentence.

On, the second writer’s account is the more persuasive of the two.

10Paraphrase this input sentence for use in your essay: 'Museums that charge for entry attract fewer visitors but spend more per visitor on conservation.'

Keep going

30 more questions on this page

Leave your email and the rest of the set opens straight away — on this page and every other exam page on the site. We read every address by hand and write back with practice suited to what you are preparing for. No list, no drip sequence.

One email, once. We never sell it or pass it on.

Note

Pick Two Activity is an independent tool. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by Cambridge University Press & Assessment, the British Council, IDP, ETS, Duolingo or any other exam board. Exam names are trademarks of their owners and are used here only to describe the exam you are preparing for. Every question on this page is original practice written by us: we do not provide, copy or reproduce official exam papers.

Frequently asked questions

How long should the essay be?

Stay inside the range printed on the question paper. Examiners penalise answers that fall well short, because the content points cannot all be covered, and answers that run well over, because relevance and organisation suffer.

Do I have to give my own opinion?

You have to evaluate, which is not quite the same thing. A reasoned judgement about which argument holds up is required; a list of personal preferences is not, and will not earn the marks.

Can I use bullet points in the essay?

No. The essay is continuous prose. Bullet points belong in the report, and using them here loses marks for communicative achievement.

Should I cover every point in both texts?

No. Cover the key points, which usually means two per text. An answer that races through eight points has no room to evaluate any of them, and evaluation is where the higher bands are.

Is it safe to reuse phrases from the input texts?

Short common phrases are unavoidable and are not penalised. A distinctive phrase lifted whole is discounted, and if the content point depends on it, that point may be lost as well.

What tense should I use to report the writers?

The present simple: the first writer argues, the second text maintains. The present is the convention for discussing what a text says, and switching to the past makes the essay read like a narrative of the reading.