Skip to content
Pick TwoActivity

IELTS Speaking Part 3: discussion question practice

B2Listening & Speaking40 questionsUpdated

Speaking Part 3 moves from your own life to the general questions behind it: why people behave as they do, how things have changed, what might happen next. It is the part that separates candidates, because it asks for opinions with reasons and for speculation about things you have never thought about. This page trains those habits with forty original questions.

What this task tests

  • Whether you answer the question asked rather than the topic it belongs to.
  • Development: a position, a reason, an example or consequence.
  • Whether you can speculate about the future with appropriate grammar.
  • Comparison of past and present, which almost every Part 3 set asks for.
  • Hedging: it depends, by and large, I would imagine.
  • Whether you can disagree with a suggestion politely and clearly.
  • Range of abstract vocabulary without memorised phrases.
  • Whether you can ask for clarification naturally when a question is unclear.
  • Whether you keep answers to a sensible length: developed but not a lecture.
  • Fluency when thinking and speaking at the same time.

How to do it

  1. Step 1:

    Answer the first clause first

    Give a direct answer in one sentence, then develop. Starting with 'that's an interesting question' delays the thing being marked.

  2. Step 2:

    Use the three-move shape

    Position, reason, illustration. Three or four sentences is the right length for most Part 3 answers.

  3. Step 3:

    Generalise deliberately

    Part 3 is about people in general, so use 'people tend to', 'in most cases', 'there is a tendency for'. Personal stories belong in Part 2.

  4. Step 4:

    Hedge when you are unsure

    'I would imagine', 'it probably depends on' are natural and buy thinking time without empty filler.

  5. Step 5:

    Take the both-sides route when stuck

    Name the two positions, then say which you find more convincing. It gives structure to an answer you had not thought about.

  6. Step 6:

    Handle the future with modals

    Is likely to, might well, I can see it becoming. Avoid flat predictions you cannot support.

  7. Step 7:

    Ask for clarification properly

    'Do you mean in schools specifically, or generally?' is fluent and appropriate. Silence is not.

  8. Step 8:

    Mark the comparison when you make one

    'Whereas twenty years ago...' signals the past-present comparison the examiner is listening for.

  9. Step 9:

    Stop when the answer is complete

    A developed answer that ends cleanly reads better than one that circles back to its opening point.

Mistakes that cost marks

  • Not thisThat's a very interesting question, and I think it is a topic many people discuss nowadays.

    ThisProbably yes, mainly because it costs families nothing.

    Preamble uses assessed speaking time and shows no content; examiners are listening for the answer.

  • Not thisAnswering with a personal anecdote when asked about society in general.

    ThisMaking a general claim and using the anecdote only as a brief illustration.

    Part 3 questions are about people in general, and an answer built on one person does not address them.

  • Not thisGiving a one-sentence answer and stopping.

    ThisAdding a reason and a consequence.

    Undeveloped answers limit the fluency and coherence mark, and force the examiner to prompt.

  • Not thisSaying 'I don't know' and waiting.

    ThisSaying 'I have not thought about it before, but I would guess that...'

    Speculation is part of what Part 3 tests, and an honest guess is scoreable English while silence is not.

  • Not thisIn my opinion, from my point of view, personally I believe, all in one answer.

    ThisOne opinion phrase, then the content.

    Stacked opinion formulas are memorised padding and are recognised as such.

  • Not thisDisagreeing with the examiner by saying 'No, that is wrong'.

    This'I would look at it slightly differently, because...'

    Part 3 invites disagreement, but the grading is partly on range, and polite disagreement uses more sophisticated language.

  • Not thisSpeaking for two minutes on one Part 3 question.

    ThisThree or four developed sentences.

    Part 3 is a discussion; very long answers prevent the examiner from covering the range of questions they need.

  • Not thisUsing rare words incorrectly to sound advanced.

    ThisUsing the precise word you control.

    Lexical resource rewards accurate and appropriate use, so a misused rare word scores below a well-used common one.

Language this task keeps reusing

by and large
generally speaking
tend to
usually do
it depends on
a phrase introducing conditions on an answer
arguably
it can reasonably be claimed that
to some extent
partly
a shift
a change in direction or attitude
unprecedented
never having happened before
trade-off
something given up in return for something gained
knock-on effect
an indirect result of a change
vested interest
a private reason for wanting a particular outcome
in the long run
over an extended future period
at the expense of
with a cost to something else
bear in mind
to remember when judging something
a case in point
a clear example of what has just been said
on the face of it
judging by first appearances
all things considered
taking everything into account

Practice: speaking part 3

40 original questions. The first 10 are open to everyone. Answers are checked in your browser and never sent to us, so you can share this page with a class as it is.

1Complete the sentence.

Part 3 questions are about people and society in general rather than about your own.
Which is the best opening to a Part 3 answer?

3Complete the sentence.

A developed Part 3 answer usually has a position, a reason and an.
The examiner asks: 'Why do people move to cities?' Which answer is best developed?
Decide whether each statement about Part 3 is true or false.
  • Answers should generally be longer than in Part 1.
  • A two-minute answer to a single question is the right length.
  • You may ask the examiner to clarify a question.
3 to go

6Complete the sentence.

A phrase meaning generally speaking is 'by and'.

7How would you answer a Part 3 question about something you have never considered?

Which phrase is the most natural way to ask for clarification?

9Complete the sentence.

Something that has never happened before is.
The examiner asks about the future of work. Which grammar suits the answer?

Keep going

30 more questions on this page

Leave your email and the rest of the set opens straight away — on this page and every other exam page on the site. We read every address by hand and write back with practice suited to what you are preparing for. No list, no drip sequence.

One email, once. We never sell it or pass it on.

Note

Pick Two Activity is an independent tool. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by Cambridge University Press & Assessment, the British Council, IDP, ETS, Duolingo or any other exam board. Exam names are trademarks of their owners and are used here only to describe the exam you are preparing for. Every question on this page is original practice written by us: we do not provide, copy or reproduce official exam papers.

Frequently asked questions

How long should a Part 3 answer be?

Around three or four developed sentences, or fifteen to thirty seconds. Long enough to show reasoning, short enough for the examiner to cover the questions they need.

Is it acceptable to disagree with the examiner?

Yes, and it is often the strongest answer. The examiner is testing your ability to argue, so a reasoned disagreement in polite language is worth more than automatic agreement.

What if I have no opinion on the question?

Say so and then reason aloud. 'I have not thought about it, but I would guess...' is fluent, honest English and gives the examiner something to assess; silence gives nothing.

Do I need facts and statistics?

No. General tendencies are exactly what the question asks for. 'People tend to' and 'in most cases' are more appropriate than invented figures.

How is Part 3 related to Part 2?

The questions usually grow out of the Part 2 topic, moving from your experience to the general issues behind it. Expect the abstract version of whatever card you were given.

How do I practise this alone?

Take any Part 2 topic and write three abstract questions about it — why, how has it changed, what will happen next — then answer each aloud in thirty seconds. That is the exact transition the examiner makes.