Skip to content
Pick TwoActivity

C1 Advanced review: Part 2 task practice and phrases

C1Writing40 questionsUpdated

A C1 Advanced review is written for readers of a magazine or website who are deciding whether to watch, read, visit or buy something. The commonest failure is a review that retells the plot; what earns marks is evaluation, supported by specifics, and a recommendation aimed at a particular kind of reader.

What this task tests

  • Evaluating rather than summarising: judging, not retelling.
  • Supporting a judgement with a specific detail from the thing reviewed.
  • Writing in a lively, semi-formal register for a general readership.
  • Balancing praise and reservation so the verdict is credible.
  • Targeting a recommendation at a described kind of reader or viewer.
  • Using precise evaluative vocabulary instead of ‘good’, ‘bad’ and ‘nice’.
  • Covering every bullet in the prompt, including the one about who would enjoy it.
  • Keeping description brief enough to leave room for judgement.

How to do it

  1. Step 1:

    Decide your verdict before you write a word

    A review is an argument for a judgement. If you do not know what you think, the paragraphs will drift into summary, which is the one thing this genre must not do.

  2. Step 2:

    Limit description to two or three sentences

    The reader needs enough to follow you and no more: what it is, where it is, roughly what happens. Everything else is evidence for your verdict.

  3. Step 3:

    Pair every judgement with a specific

    ‘The dialogue is sharp’ is an assertion. ‘The dialogue is sharp, particularly in the scenes between the two sisters’ is a review. One specific per paragraph is enough.

  4. Step 4:

    Include one genuine reservation

    Unbroken praise reads as advertising. A single, well-chosen criticism makes the praise believable and gives you a natural paragraph of contrast.

  5. Step 5:

    Aim the recommendation at someone

    ‘Anyone who enjoyed her earlier novels will find this familiar and rewarding; readers new to her may want to start elsewhere.’ Naming the audience answers the task bullet directly.

  6. Step 6:

    Vary the evaluative vocabulary deliberately

    Plan three or four precise adjectives before you start: understated, overlong, inventive, uneven. Reaching for them in the moment is how reviews end up full of ‘very good’.

  7. Step 7:

    Use a title if it helps the reader

    A short title or heading is acceptable and frames the piece. Keep it plain and relevant rather than clever for its own sake.

  8. Step 8:

    Check the ending actually recommends

    Reviews often trail off into a last observation. The final sentence should leave the reader knowing what you would tell them to do.

Mistakes that cost marks

  • Not thisFirst the hero goes to the city, then he meets a woman, then they argue, then…

    ThisThe story follows a young engineer through a single difficult year in the city.

    Plot retelling fills the word count with material the reader did not ask for and demonstrates no evaluation.

  • Not thisThe film was very good and the acting was very good too.

    ThisThe film is quietly observed, and the two leads make an unlikely friendship convincing.

    Repeated ‘very good’ shows no range. Precise adjectives are what lift a review into the higher bands.

  • Not thisEveryone should definitely see this film, it is perfect.

    ThisViewers who like slow, character-led drama will enjoy it; those who want pace may not.

    A targeted recommendation answers the task; an unqualified superlative does not, and it reads as less trustworthy.

  • Not thisI am writing to inform you of my opinion of the restaurant.

    ThisThe new place on Mill Street has been full since it opened, and it is easy to see why.

    A review is not a letter. Formal letter openings are the wrong register and waste the strongest position in the piece.

  • Not thisThe book is boring but also exciting and quite long and interesting.

    ThisThe book is overlong, but the final third earns the patience it demands.

    Contradictory adjectives in a list read as indecision. A concession expressed in one sentence reads as judgement.

  • Not thisRevealing how the story ends.

    ThisDescribing the effect of the ending without saying what it is.

    The reader is deciding whether to watch or read it. Spoiling that is a failure of audience awareness, which is assessed.

Language this task keeps reusing

get off to a slow start
begin in an uninteresting way
make up for
compensate for
let something down
be the weak part of something otherwise good
for the most part
mostly
competent if unadventurous
adequate but not original
worth the price of admission
good enough to justify the cost
not without its faults
having some weaknesses
live up to
be as good as expected
fall flat
fail to have the intended effect
leave something to be desired
be less good than it should be
at its best
in its strongest moments
hesitate to recommend
be unwilling to advise someone to try it
value for money
worth what it costs
appeal to
be attractive or interesting to

Practice: the review

40 original questions. The first 10 are open to everyone. Answers are checked in your browser and never sent to us, so you can share this page with a class as it is.

Who is the reader of a C1 Advanced review?

2Complete the sentence.

The novel getsto a slow start.

3Complete the sentence.

The second half more than makesfor it.
Decide whether each statement about the review is true or false.
  • A review should evaluate rather than retell the plot.
  • A rhetorical question is acceptable in this genre.
  • The review should reveal the ending so readers know what happens.
3 to go
Which sentence evaluates rather than describes?

6Complete the sentence.

What lets the filmis its ending.

7Outline the structure of a review in four lines.

Which opening suits a review?

9Complete the sentence.

The performances are, for the most, convincing.

10Complete the sentence.

The direction is competentunadventurous.

Keep going

30 more questions on this page

Leave your email and the rest of the set opens straight away — on this page and every other exam page on the site. We read every address by hand and write back with practice suited to what you are preparing for. No list, no drip sequence.

One email, once. We never sell it or pass it on.

Note

Pick Two Activity is an independent tool. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by Cambridge University Press & Assessment, the British Council, IDP, ETS, Duolingo or any other exam board. Exam names are trademarks of their owners and are used here only to describe the exam you are preparing for. Every question on this page is original practice written by us: we do not provide, copy or reproduce official exam papers.

Frequently asked questions

Can I write a review of something I have invented?

Yes, and it is often easier. A film or restaurant you invent lets you choose details that support your argument, which is what the task rewards. Keep it plausible and consistent.

How formal should a review be?

Semi-formal and readable. Contractions and a rhetorical question are fine; slang and insults are not. Imagine a well-written magazine column rather than a message to a friend.

Do I have to be positive?

No. A negative review can score just as highly, provided the criticism is specific and the tone stays measured. What does not work is unfocused complaint with no evidence.

How much detail about the plot is safe?

Enough to make your judgements comprehensible, which is usually two or three sentences. Never reveal the ending; describe its effect instead, which is more useful to the reader anyway.

Should a review have paragraphs?

Yes, three or four. Even a short review needs the reader to see where the description stops and the judgement begins, and paragraphing is what shows that.